tv Squawk Box CNBC December 14, 2016 6:00am-9:01am EST
begins right now. live from new york where business never sleeps, this is "squawk box." good morning. welcome here to "squawk box" on cnbc. i'm melissa lee with andrew ross sorkin, joe and becky are off today. equity futures at this hour, locking to maybe approach dow 20,000. looking to open lower on the dow. down by about 8 points. s&p adding about 1.25 points at the open. nasdaq down about 3.5. all of this in anticipation of the fed this afternoon. let's look at what's going on overnight in asia. after china came out with stronger industrial output numbers and retail sales numbers. slight gains in the hang seng and the nikkei over in japan. the shanghai down by a half point. european equities await for the fed decision.
off of 11-week highs in europe. let's look at the action in the crude markets. opec members have agreed to cut production. wti down today 1.2%. brent down 1%. >> taking a breather. >> it's been a torrid run in the oil market. u.s. federal reserve will announce the latest interest rate decision. the fed expected to raise rates for the second time in ten years. also expecting an updated economic and interest rate forecast. you can watch all of this, the full coverage of the fed announcement and janet yellen's news conference on cnbc. there are a few other key reports to watch today. here's what's happening. 8:30 a.m. eastern time, the producer price index and retail sales come out. at 9:15 a.m., industrial production and business inventories for october. that's at 10:00 a.m. eastern time. now let's talk a bit of politics. president-elect trump will be holding a roundtable summit with
tech industry leaders today. among those expected to attend, the man who put this together, peter thiel, bet on trump early and was one of the few in silicon valley. cheryl sandberg will join the group. elon musk, larry page and eric schmit, one notable absence, jack dorsey, the man who invented twitter, trump's most used social platform has not been invited this comes one day after dorsey did a q&a session with whistle-blower eric snowden. >> you have to wonder if they're related? >> i'm putting it unrelated in terms of snowden, but is it
about the business? >> he is the ceo of a payments company and twitter. >> it's also very possible that maybe peter thiel -- maybe there's back-channel talks. maybe dorsey suggested he was not -- i don't know. dorsey was probably one of the most outspoken on trump during the campaign on the other end of it. meaning he had made enough inferences if not had gone further. i don't know. so had jeff bezos and others. >> and trump took direct fire on cheryl sandberg, a lot of these guys meeting with him today. it's a kiss and make up session. >> my anxiety -- i don't know if it's anxiety, my anxiety if i was one of these ceos, you'll walk in there and it will be -- remember the media meeting with all the media heads? it was known as the firing line? >> yelled at everybody. wonder if it will be a good
cop/bad cop situation going on. >> ahead of the tech summit, ginni rometty announcing her company will hire 25,000. the job also come over the span of four years including 6,000 positions added in 2017. the company will reinvest on training, focusing on vocational education. she will attend the meeting today. >> she has been on this for quite some time. >> she's on the advisory council. >> the second trump won, she was off to the races on blue car worke e. doll collar workers. >> i would want her to be off to the races to, beginning some edge with the incoming administration. >> on the twitter issue, our
good friend nick dunn, managing editor here at the company, cnbc, remember that thiel criticized twitter as being run by pot smokers when he was on "squawk box." given that he was handing out the invitations. >> no invitations to pot smokers. president-elect trump chose ryan zinke to be his interior secretary. he is the first gop congressman from montana. a top transition source confirming that pick to nbc. the news was a surprise. last week an aide said kathy mcmore rick rogers would be the pick for that post. goldman sachs will promote david salomon and harvey schwartz to replace david cohn. this is a structure that's been in place for quite some time
having a dual co-head at that juncture. david faber talked about solomon being one of those people. a new report in the china daily newspaper says china's government will soon slap a penalty on an unnamed u.s. automaker for monopolistic behavior. corporate news, federal regulators dealing a blow to wells fargo. they determined the bank has not done enough to come up with an adequate living will plan for avoiding a taxpayer bailout. if it were to face bankruptcy as a result, the fed and fdic are placing new restrictions on the lender barring it from setting up new international banking businesses and buying non-bank subsidia subsidiaries. this is the first tiis could ca
two year s force wells fargo to divest itself of assets. this seems to be one bank that can't get itself together after the scandal of the past several months. this is the one bank that was supposed to be the classic traditional bank that had its act together, perhaps better than the others. now all of it seems to be upside-down. >> tim sloan should thank trump. >> yes. >> ever since the election, it's not been an issue. the stock off to the races. in global financial news, monte dei paschi confirming the ecb rejected its request to get more time to raise capital.
the ecb told the bank a delay could cause a further deterioration in its liquidity threatening its survival. monte dei paschi's board is meeting today to decide whether to launch a last-ditch privately funded attempt to raise cash as soon as tomorrow. the real deadline is december 31st. president-elect trump announcing his intention to nominate former texas governor rick perry as secretary of energy this had been reported yesterday, expected, but made official moments ago. little bit of deal news. so much news this morning. johnson & johnson is dropping its pursuit of swiss drugmaker actelion. reports say that johnson & johnson was unwilling to pay the price needed to seal the deal. sanofi is now reportedly back in talks to buy the largest biotech firm. sad news this morning to bring you. actor alan thicke is dead after suffering a heart attack during a pick-up hockey game in
california. the actor was best known for playing the dad on the hit s sitcom "growing pains. the c he is survived by three sons, including singer robin thicke. he was 69 years old. turning back to the markets, the dow, s&p 500, nasdaq logging new all-time highs with the dow loading at a record for the 16th straight time. the dow is less than 100 points away from the 20,000 mark. for some perspective on why this is psychologically important for investors, we're joined by jack caffrey, and covering the fixed income angle as we await the fed
income decision, bill irving, portfolio manager over at fidelity investments. jack, i'll start off with you. are you still aggressively overweight? how do you feel about the market now? >> i think the market can continue to rally into year-end and rally into the first quarter. right now we have -- i think we have two major supporters, the psychology, the dow closing in on a new record. we love round numbers and those milestones. that feeds the exuberance, exuberance is supported. economics have turned higher. >> can i ask how much higher it can do? you said rally into, but what are we talking about from here on out? >> what's your time frame? you know -- >> do you think the first quarter? >> yeah. >> at point or two? percentage point or two? >> could be a percent to three -- 1% to 3% over the next two months.
it could be a nice pulling forward of the returns next year. at some point we'll have the reality set in and not everything we want will be happening. we saw that earlier this week with mcconnell saying i want tax reform but neutral. >> is this a buy the rumor or sell the news event where come january 20th we'll look at pressure on the markets. >> not necessarily the 20th, it's you start going to congress and this is are what i would like. people have to step back from i want i want to what can i get. >> bill, important to the market outlook is the trajectory of rate hikes. what do you think the fed will signal? >> there's been solid payroll gains and inflation trending towards 2%. so in that context the market widely expects the fed to raise
25 basis points. that's what we'll get. that's the easy part. the bigger challenge is communicating to the market the likely path of interest rates in the months and years to come. there it will be interesting to see whether they stick with their guidance they've given so far. what do you think? we know this is a tricky tightrope to walk. market expectations are high for gdp growth next year. there's a gap between what people think will happen and what is actually happening now. where do you fall within that? >> i think 20 17 could prove to be the mirror image of what we got in 2016. heading into this year, expectation was four interest rate hikes, up to today we've gotten zero. plans have been derailed by china concerns in the winter,
brexit in the summer. maybe the new administration is generate spending tax and more -- >> so you're more skeptical on the results of fiscal stimulus and the ability of the administration actually to enact that to impact the economy next year. that's what it sounds like. >> no what i'm saying is that if they do deliver that fiscal stimulus, the fed may be forced to push back with more interest rate hikes than is currently priced into the market. to balance things out. >> effectively you would add that every central bank has been asking for fiscal stimulus for years. they're saying monetary spending has reached its limits, we would like some help. there will be a balancing act between we've been asking for this, now we get it.
will we take the bunch bowl away completely? >> do they say they get it today or when it happens? the markets are acting as if we have it today. >> the equity market is acting like it will happen imminently. at 17 plus earnings, you expect it sooner. the idea of shovel ready projects is much talked about but not really a reality. >> bill, your concern? >> the fed is worried about pouring too much fiscal stimulus already near full recovery. for now they'll keep their head low and not comment much on what policies we nigmight get from t trump administration. >> i imagine your clients who do
have cash, you're telling them to go all in? to capture this -- >> 1% to 3% upside? >> the other question is what are you dumping into? >> the 1% to 3% makes sense for the largely invested client. >> i imagine you do have clients who missed this. >> we have clients who have been underinvested and keep saying i want the pullback. the challenge is with every pullback there's been a reason for the pullback. some scary story has gotten us there. with that there's been a resignation, and that's why people have been frustrated. >> are you also advising people not to sell this year? take gains next year? >> i think if you get the prospect of tax reform next year and lower rates, it would make sense to hold things. seasonally you have things not sell now. institutional selling largely ended in october. that's why you have the season
the strength in november, december, january. >> the flip side, bill, people were in bond funds, feeling losses. could that be added selling pressure? >> i think the selloff could have some momentum. but the calls that this is the end of the three decade bull market in bonds, that may be premature. i say that for a couple reasons. since the great recession, i can't count the number of times i've heard people say we're in a rising rate environment and this is the end for bonds. it's been wrong time and time again. the factors that have kept interest rates low is still in place. aging demographics, low productive growth. >> do we revisit the lows on the ten-year yield? >> i don't think we do over the next six months. over the next couple of years we could. >> all right. we'll leave it there. when we return,
this is where i trade andrs. manage my portfolio. since i added futures, i have access to the oil markets and gold markets. okay. i'm plugged into equities- trade confirmed- and i have global access 24/7. meaning i can do what i need to do, then i can focus on what i want to do. visit learnfuturestoday.com to see what adding futures can do for you.
generosity is its oyou can handle being a mom for half an hour. i'm in all the way. is that understood? i don't know what she's up to, but it's not good. can't the world be my noodles and butter? get your mind out of the gutter. mornings are for coffee and contemplation. that was a really profound observation. you got a mean case of the detox blues. don't start a war you know you're going to lose. finally you can now find all of netflix in the same place as all your other entertainment. on xfinity x1.
welcome back to "squawk box." stocks to watch today, pershing square cutting its stake in valeant pharmaceuticals. pershing's investment in valeant has lost $2 billion in value this year. >> we said he did it to help create a tax loss? he did it on purpose. >> he wanted to take the tax loss this year. >> i understand he wanted to take the tax loss, as opposed to holding -- nobody goes into it to -- >> create it. exactly. he tolled is in order to tasold tax loss. >> hertz is cut in cutting and
replacing its ceo. at the same time the rental car company said it will reduce the size of its board. >> the kids clothes at zara, great. >> yes. >> very, very true. >> president-elect trump getting ready to meet tech leaders today, later today . jobs will be on the agenda he made his pick for energy secretary, john perry. john harwood joins us from outside the trump tower. not far from zara. good morning to you. >> reporter: good morning. first of all, can't let it go unnoticed, he will be meeting with elon musk today. are you happy now?
>> i'm thrilled. very happy. >> did your column make that happen? >> don't know. it may have helped. peter thiel's people reached out to elon musk. they worked together at pay pal, long-time friends. >> yep. >> so many interesting subplots, aside from the sorkin column in this tech industry meeting with president-elect trump. trump went after the tech industry during the campaign, criticized apple for making products overseas, criticized bezos of amazon saying he was using the "washington post" to attack trump and preserve his tax position in washington. the tech industry was very much anti-trump. they didn't like his crude populism, they didn't like some of the stances he took on social issues. so this is a potential meeting
with all sorts of potential for conflict. i would expect it to be respectful. yesterday bill gates sat down with becky and sort of outlined in a preview form how the two sides might be able to reach common ground. >> i think whether it's education or stopping epidemics, other health breaks through, finishing polio, and in this energy space there can be a very upbeat message that his administration is going to organize things, get rid of barriers and have american leadership through innovation be one of the things that he gets behind. >> so, innovation is the idea that bill gates pointed to. potential place for them to come together. donald trump has already talked about tariffs, ripping up trade deals that have existed. and we're just going to have to wait and see when those tech industry leaders come out of
that meeting with the president-elect, exactly what the tone was, whether there was defiance, tough talk, or whether it was entirely a peacemaking session. >> all right. how do you think trump could, to the extent he can jawbone the creation of these types of jobs, he had this type of conversation before, at least a conversation of sorts with tim cook, that i think both of them might have talked about publicly, bringing back jobs to the united states. do you think you'll get commitments today from them about this type of thing? we talked about ginni rometty talking about a plan for blue collar jobs. how do you think this will go? >> i will be surprised if tech industry leaders come out of a meeting with donald trump and issue a commitment to him to
doppler things that they were not already going to do. the softbank executive came out of the meeting with donald trump and said he would invest $50 billion in the united states, create 50,000 jobs, a lot of that was already in train. i don't think tech industry leaders would come out and give the impression that they have been brought to heel by donald trump. i think they'll explore areas where they have things in common. see if this president strikes a tone that they think is friendlier to the kind of work that they do. the emphases that donald trump made, he was talking about i'll bring back steel jobs or coal jobs. that's a message and constituency that he was talking to that is much, much different to what silicon valley is talking about. some on his team are looking, including his choice for attorney general, have been looking to tamp down the use of
h 1 b visas which many in silicon valley are happy using. i don't know if you saw this piece in politico this morning, elizabeth warren preparing an assault on mnuchin, also on tillerson by the democrats and perhaps some republicans. what do you think the chances are that both of them get confirmed? >> i think the chances that mnuchin gets confirmed are quite good. i think tillerson is going to be a tougher fight because you've got the overlay of fossil fuel executives being appointed, the relationship with russia, hacking allegations, the commitment to a bipartisan investigation, all of that makes the environment for tillerson more difficult. you have had rubio, mccain, lindsey graham express concern.
there's a risk there for tillerson. less so for mnuchin. where you will see more of a traditional left/right split. >> john harwood, thank you very much. business leaders are making it clear president-elect trump needs to make good on tax reform. that's according to the results of the latest cnbc global cfo council survey. the group manages more than $4 trillion in market capitalization. 67% said corporate tax reform should be the top priority, followed by the tie between infrastructure, overseas cash repatriation and withdrawal from tpp. accomplishing one of those might put the council at ease. for the second quarter, consumer demand was the biggest risk. 41% said the political movement has had a negative impact on demand this year. for the full results, head over
the first stock index was created, as a benchmark for average. yet a lot of people still build portfolios with strategies that just track the benchmarks. but investing isn't about achieving average. it's about achieving goals. and invesco believes doing that today requires the art and expertise of high-conviction investing. translation? why invest in average?
>> do you have christmas sweaters? >> oh, yes, do you not watch the show during the holidays? >> maybe i mentally block the memory out. >> we even have a sweater graphic that we can run. absolutely. >> can you start wearing them next week? >> will you be here? >> i'll be here. >> done. >> welcome back to "squawk box." u.s. equity futures. they are taking a minor breather here on the rally. the dow jones looking about 15 points. let's look at crude. wti taking its own breather now at 52.14. >> president-elect trump promising to bring drug prices down during his "time" person of the year interview. what can he do? which company is most at risk? meg tirrell joins us from
washington. good morning. >> reporter: good morning. we're here at the fda cms summit. one sector that has been taking a major breather in healthcare since the election is the drug industry. biotech had rallied after the election on the expectation there may be some alleviation of pressure on drug prices. donald trump in his "time" magazine person of the year interview saying "i don't like what's happening with drug prices. i'm going to bring drug prices down." everybody is trying to figure out what could donald trump do. the biggest thing is work with congress to give medicare the power to negotiate on drug price. this is a popular idea among the public but has not gained traction in the government. that is something that is constantly coming up. we talked with merck, they said
no fda commissioner has certified those drugs as safe. the most likely is political and public pressure on drug companies, which we've more seen from people like hillary clinton and bernie sanders. which companies would be targets of donald trump? some folks say perhaps the drugs the government spends the most money on. looking at medicare part d, covering drugs that people take at home. you can see the biggest drugs there covered by medicare part d in 2015, nobody will be surprised to see harvoni at the top. medicare spent about $7 billion on that. lantus for diabetes, crestor
also seeing big spending. but we have not seen giant price increases and we're seeing more competition in diabetes and cholesterol. so analysts are saying we're seeing pressure in insulin. where we may see that next is in multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. andrew, back to you. >> thanks, meg. i like the elevator music that is the soundtrack for her report. >> and the tree. >> enjoying it. thank you for that, meg. for more on the impact of the health stocks from the trump administration, let's bring in les fontleiter from he square capital management and author of "healthcare investing: profiting from the new world of pharma, biotech and healthcare services." good morning what is your take here. you saw that list. >> yep. >> would you put them in that order in terms of who is at
risk? >> on that, i'd actually maybe look at the medicare part b drugs, like companies drugs, buy lodg bio logics. but rheumatoid arthritis, there is not pricing pressure there, lots of drug dogs the same thing. >> your expectation in terms of the pressure that will come to bear on these companies that will be in the form of jawboning, meaning donald trump using his bullipulpet?
>> i think it's more naming and shaming. that's a cool bank shot. he would have to -- that's a policy they could do. i don't know. nobody said it. i don't think it will happen. >> we've seen some effort by the industry to self-police. brett sanders enacted the social contract which vows to sort of keep prices in check. also provide it to certain people who make x times the -- the level above poverty. at the same time when you look at that list and you look at gilead, which had two drugs on that list that meg gave, harvoni in the hep c complex, those drugs were expected to increase anywhere, right? >> gilead is in its own orbit. most of wall street things we'll find an acquisition for them. i'm not convinced. they have the ingredients for the drug. as a pane they need to get
moving. that's only part of healthcare. we have insurance companies, which might be doing better. hospitals, if they repeal obama care may be at risk. it's a $3 trillion industry. >> walk us through your play book what you go long in this environment, what you sit out and perhaps in the interest of shorting something, what you do there. >> we don't do a lot. there's a new president. i have to be honest. the underlying demographics, innovation, will not change no matter who is president. that said, trump seems to at least at the moment seems to be working on a more market based versus obama more market based. things like health savings account. that would be united, health equity, those are longs. we are generally short the biotech, mid cap biotech index because of lack of catalyst. the interest rate environment is unfavorable for them.
pricing is -- >> you said mid cap? >> small and mid. >> small and mid. >> doing that mostly through indexes. short the xbi, short the ibb. there will always be winners. some will have great cures, they'll do well. >> if you're short the ibb, you're shorting the biggest biotech companies as well. >> predominantly xbi to be fair. the larger caps are -- have a lot of cash. they're probably at least in our view dead money. i don't see a lot of excitement there, until we get to the middle of the year, then trump's policies will come through. i think you're better off in the services like the hmos. maybe some of the major pharmas, because they have so much cash, they can do buybacks. >> i was going to ask about the repatriation. >> there's a theme, monies will be repatriated, they'll go on this wild m&a spree. they have money now. so they really haven't done a lot of deals.
i think next year will be a better deal year than this year. that's not saying much. i don't see this sort of wave of consolidation. >> okay. thank you for coming in. >> thank you. coming up, new york apartment prices skyrocketing to a high, but the numbers may be skewed. ♪home is where i want to be ♪home we love being green. so the nest learning thermostat connects to your phone, and learns what you like, to help you save energy. and that's something everyone can appreciate. ♪
♪ >> the red sweater. i need the red sweater. welcome back to "squawk box." some stocks to watch this morning. general motors is asking the u.s. supreme court to overturn an appeals court which ruled -- a ruling which said the automaker's 2009 bankruptcy does not shield it from lawsuits over faulty ignition switches linked to 124 deaths and 275 injuries. gm is seeking to block hundreds of customer lawsuits. and hyatt is launching a new $250 million stock buyback program. and fortune brand is raising its dividend by 13% to 18 cents a share. in october the maker of home fixture hardware and security products reported third quarter profit rose 15%. time for the executive edge.
the average sales price of a manhattan apartment is expected to top $2 million this year for the first time. that's according to city reality. prices were driven higher bay jump in sales of kocondos value over $10 million and more. researchers predict prices will level off in 2017 after nearly doubling over the past decade. "star wars" fans lining up at the famous tlc chinese theater in l.a. ahead of the thursday night premiere of ""star war"star w wars film. they will also raise money for the star light foundation. the latest movie expected to bring in $300 million just this weekend alone. did you see this review? the review in the "new york
times" was just blistering. in a not so nice way. >> i almost didn't want to read it. i didn't want to know. >> they didn't give anything away. but it was -- >> i didn't want to be tainted. >> was nasty. it could still be a bad movie and rake in $300 million which would be great for disney. >> coming up, our special guest at the top of the hour, lazard's peter orzag will join us. we will talk about the trump transition and today's fed meeting. mary buys a little lamb. one of millions of orders on this company's servers. accessible by thousands of suppliers and employees globally. but with cyber threats on the rise,
management. nearly $450 billion in assets under management. good to see you. >> good to see you. jeffrey gundlach said if bond yields hit 3%, it's the end of the bull market in bonds. do you see it that over the la weeks the markets clearly have become more optimistic on growth, on risk. you cut corporate taxes, that's obviously playing out. led to higher bond yields. the story is less straightforward. we haven't really addressed the issues of long-term demographics, long-term productivity. the long-term oversupply of supply chains around the world. to keep downward pressure. i think in contrast to mr. gunlock, we can be optimistic for the next new years.
>> that means the yield curve flattens. you see it happening? that's terrible for banks. you don't rally on a steep yield curve. >> what banks really care about is the five-point yield curve. banks don't lend a lot of 30-year money. they're lending money at the five-year point and borrowing overnight. what you have is that -- but what i'm talking about is those 30-year bonds relative to fives. you can see, again, you can see an optimistic scenario for the next two or three years. faster growth as a result of more spending, tax cuts. that should be higher bond yields in the front end. but that longer term story where you're talking about demographics, productivity, what's going on around the world, i don't see the case there that you would see bond yields going meaningfully higher. >> do you think the bank stocks are appropriately priced? >> it's interesting.
we're talking with the head of our credit team. there are three things that could be affecting bank stocks. number one, better growth expectations. that's good for banks. number two, some expectations of deregulation. you know, that's obviously on the table. and number three is the steepening of the yield curve. you know, kind of funds to fives. what's his view on what's going on there. so head of bank credit said it's mostly the steepening of yield curves. yield curves are higher. that's going to help on profitability. and, you know, that's already in the market. so we can speculate on the growth part, on the deregulation part. the thing that's happened, that we agree can happen is five-year yields are higher. banks are going to have better profitability and i think bank stocks should respond to that. so i think that's kind of appropriate. i think, you know, the issues on deregulation and growth, we'll see. i think a lot of that's to be determined. we don't really know what he's going to do in terms of fiscal
and in terms of deregulation. i wouldn't put too much stock on those, but i would say higher 5-year yields and interest margins, that's there. we can all agree on that and that should be bank positive. >> is there still a place for bonds in people's portfolios? people went into the elections probably positioned terribly. i mean, i would imagine most people have been. and they were long bonds way too long and felt the selloff. they're going to open up their quarterly statements and they're not going to see this rally -- the powerful rally we've seen reflected in their statements because they weren't positioned that way. >> yeah. well, so two things. first of all, in positioning wi withing we went in with overweight risks. on the other hand we had risk assets in our portfolio. we had a diversified portfolio. the risk assets have done quite well. so even in an environment where growth looks a little bit better or even in an environment where,
you know, people are excited about corporate tax cuts, i think you have to have a diversified portfolio. if you do that right, then you could have the interest rate risk and be fine. the other thing if i could say real quick, the other thing is, you know, a lot of people talking about center of the distribution here. how big is the tax cut going to be? you also have to admit the tails are much, much fatter than they were before. that could go in a number of ways. whether that could go foreign policy, foreign policy missteps, what's happening with trade and immigration. there's a number of tail risks there that you need to diversify in your portfolio. >> so you have a diversified portfolio but you did risk your assets going into the election. at this point with those tail risks and with markets where they are right now, dow up 8% since the elections, are you scaling that back? going more conservative into 2017.
>> we're not. we're keeping the interest rate risk again. if we do have a foreign policy misstep, for instance, i think those positions are very important. but on the risk side, again, the kind of central story here is that, you know, you have an increase in spending, lower taxes that should be faster growth. so what we're trying to do is position for kind of the center of the distribution the next few years. again, it's too early to be confident that any of that is going to happen. we'll see. we haven't necessarily upgraded our forecasts yet. but we think that's certainly something to be cognizant of. and you have the interest rate risk as a diversifier. >> thank you. great to see you. >> good. when we come back, peter orszag and then senator bob corker. and wilf is joining us. he's right off set right now. but he'll be with us in just a moment. coming up, the dow within striking distance of 20,000.
♪ we're drowning in information. where, in all of this, is the stuff that matters? the stakes are so high, your finances, your future. how do you solve this? you don't. you partner with a firm that advises governments and the fortune 500, and, can deliver insight person to person, on what matters to you. morgan stanley.
nod. we've got reaction from the ceo of hess as the second hour of "squawk box" begins right now. ♪ live from the beating heart of business, new york city, this is "squawk box." >> good morning and welcome back to "squawk box" here on cnbc. i'm wilfred frost. i've joined andrew ross sorkin and melissa lee. odd i'm doing the welcome, but thanks for having me. >> great having you here. >> we're glad you made it through the traffic from your other studio. >> i have, indeed. not quite as quickly as normal but great to be here. let's look at the futures. yesterday we did see gains again across the board. about 0.6% for the dow taking it 90 points shy, 0.5% shy of 20k. the s&p was up a little more
than that and the nasdaq was up about 1%. the rally broadening out. futures at this hour just flat as you can see. the dow expected to open slightly lower. so 20k may prove elusive. oil prices slipping a little bit today after a strong monday and a flat tuesday. $52.30 on wti at this hour. and tstill elevated since the election. we've got a lot going on including the fed meeting. here's what's happening. the federal reserve widely expected to raise interest rates today. this would be the first time in a year the fed's decision and policy statements coming out at 2:00 p.m. eastern time followed by janet yellen's news conference 30 minutes later. as investors wait for the fed, no shortage of economic data out today. we're going to get november retail sales and the producer price index at 8:30 eastern time. then november industrial
utilization happens at 9:15 eastern time. also big headline this morning, wells fargo has been hit with sanctions by regulators for f l failing the living will test. if it should find itself on the brink of bankruptcy, wells fargo has until march now to come up with a response acceptable to regulators. this is one of those banks everybody thought was supposed to be the best managed -- i mean, put the scandal, if you will, sort of off to the side. but as a traditional bank that was not over, everything was supposed to be organized. now this. >> interesting you say focused on this. we've been focused on wells fargo but not on this because we didn't expect this. book in may stumpf said we will have this all sorted. nothing to worry about. it's a bit of an embarrassment for them. it is a negative surprise. that said the immediate impositions from the fed aren't
that threatening. so it doesn't immediately have a big impact they were down 0.5% yesterday, a little bit in the premarket today. not a big stock mover at the moment but they've got to sort it out by march. it's a question about the government and whether they sorted things out on time. we'll see. >> i was telling andrew they must be thanking their lucky stars for the election of donald trump. >> unquestionably. i think also when we were leading into the height of the scandal, as jim was saying as well, as soon as you get any talk of a rate hike, it will blow this out of the water. >> dare i say this goes to basic competence? it's just a competence story. you either do what they ask you to do and get it right or you don't. >> then they were the only big bank to fail this time around. yeah. >> so to me -- if i'm warren buffett waking up to that news, i'm saying what's wrong with these people? >> after a series of missteps. >> yes. >> to your point over the last week or so there's been one or two other little legal stories
coming out again. i think there's been a dearth of anti-wells fargo news flow because of the election, the run-up to it, the final decision of who's going to win, and the fallout in terms of positivity for banks. maybe we'll have more focus on wells moving forward. a couple of cabinet breaking picks to tell you about. rick perry to serve as secretary of energy. rick perry created a business climate that created millions of new jobs and lower energy prices. he will bring that same approach to our entire country as secretary of energy. john hess joins us later on in the program to discuss the pick and the future of energy policy in the united states. >> okay. another selection. ryan zinke. he's a proponent of keeping public lands under federal
ownership putting him at odds with some of his own party who favor privatization. today a meeting with tech leaders. there will be one noticeable absence. jack dorsey, the man who invented twitter, trump's most used social platform of course. he has not been invited. this comes just one day after dorsey did a q&a session with edward snowden. all right. back to the trump rally and the fed. the dow's on the cusp of hitting 20,000. joining us now is tom lee head of research at fundstrat global advisers. good to have you with us. we're just 89 points away from dow 20,000. are you looking at 21k already? which on a percentage basis isn't too far off. >> i'm sure it's just a matter of time. eight years ago dow was 8,000. now we're close to 20,000.
i'm sure the milestone to think about is dow 30. but when is the question. >> you have one of my most favorite market stats in one of your most recent research notes. you said whenever inflation begins to rise to historic levels, the market rallies. considerably. >> yeah. >> and most of the time. >> that's right. >> and that's what we're looking at right now? >> yes. i think it's appropriate to kind of expect higher markets. because we're getting a pickup in inflation. and it's great for earnings and companies with low margins. i think there's less regulatory pressure. you know, some optimism there. and i think there's been so much money on the sidelines and higher rates means investors starts to think equities are attractive. >> for folks who sat this out thus far and missed the train, if you will, over the past month and a half, how much room do you think there's to go in. everyone is waiting for this pullback to happen. because some people would argue nothing has fundamentally
changed. obviously the real economy's gotten better, but maybe marginally better. this is all a little bit on fumes. at some point there's going to be a break in this because there's going to be is headline that says everything donald trump wants to happen isn't going to get done or happens exactly as planned. >> that makes sense. i think everyone has to have a different time frame. i wouldn't try -- if i was an investor in cash, i wouldn't try to time the market to make the best return in the next 12 months. i think you're absolutely right. it wouldn't be a surprise if we have a 10% pullback next year, but every pullback this year had to be bought. there were only eight days where the market was more than 3% off the highs. >> let's bring peter orszag into this. we haven't properly introduced you. you could appreciate what's realistic or could happen in washington. does it match up in your mind? >> mostly. i mean, look, there will be some corporate tax change.
that by itself will give some lift to earnings, but i think the big puzzle on the stock market is not that the stock market has run up, but that the vix is so low. it's under 13. north korea, europe, you look around the world and it seems like the market is basically dramatically underpricing the potential for tail risk. >> that allows the market participants to stay long the market and have protection easily. or allows them to be long the stock. either way you look at it, there's a silver lining. >> that's right. i'd say you look at 2017 and reality is maybe the first half's not going to be as good as the second half. a low vix means you can actually buy hedging in the first half. really cheap. i mean, you can hedge the first half for 1%. you'd have no draw down and then play the second half. >> in the short-term, tom -- if in the short-term we did not get
a rate hike today, what's the reaction? >> i don't know. >> wouldn't it be horribly negative? i mean, the thinking being the fed must be seeing something that we do not see. things are much slower we are gone ahead of ourselves in terms of expectations. >> in the short-term, it's possible to sell off either way. we have to start thinking now about the fed, you know, raising rates next year and that is somewhat, you know, it creates some risks for markets. >> how many hikes do you expect at the moment next year? if we rewind 12 months, we were expecting the first rate hike in years. we were also expecting three or four this year. is there room for people to be surprised how quickly the fed might hike next year? >> i'm still in the camp i think the fed would let inflation run a little hotter.
i would think that the fed may actually tighten less than consensus expectations. >> does any of this make sense to you? >> well, again, so what's interesting here is the policy changes are being pitched as a big supply side. most of it looks like keynesian being delivered by a republican administration which is deeply ironic. >> i appreciate that point, but do you buy true stimulus measures in terms of infrastructure spending? talking about that or just the tax cuts? >> both. but not as much as what's currently being advertised. it's always easy to say there will be this huge thing that's going to happen. >> walk us through the world according to peter orszag in terms of what is actually going to happen and what's not going to happen. >> we will have a repeal on obamacare it's going to be complicated. i think we will have a rifle
shot reduction in the corporate tax rate. not the big tax reform, but some reduction. >> so what -- you won't get territorial? >> i do not think we're going to do the big get rid of the tax deductibility of interest expense and impose the corporate tax rate on imports. it's possible. >> you think there's going to be a repatriation holiday and that's it? >> and some reduction in the corporate steps. >> holiday opposed to change -- >> repatriation. what we did last time was a holiday. i think this will be deemed repatriation. pay a tax on the profits accumulated to date 8% to 12% and whether you repatriate or not -- >> you say it's a one-shot deal. what do you think the rate goes to? >> mid-20s. >> does the fiscal expansion that we're talking about deliver the kind of growth that perhaps had done if it comes earlier? >> you'll get an additional spurt of growth next year because even if the tax cuts are scaled back and even if the infrastructure package is
substantially scaled back, there still would be some. >> i want to get back to tom with the stat. the exact stat is whenever inflation begins to rise since 1950 the market rallies 84% of the time and averages of 15% return over the following 12 months. >> yes. >> where are we in that right now? >> we're in that -- if you did like a little vector, we're in sort of the best vector right now. low levels of inflation and meaningful expectations of it to pick up. i mean, that's usually good signs for stocks. >> in terms of rally, we were up 6% since the election give or take. up 8% or 9% since the election? the 15% return over the next 12 months, where are we in that? >> that's a great question. i think we're going to easily rally into the end of the year. because there's seasonals and offsides and money to be put to work. but i think there's a good chance people have too optimistic expectations for
2017. >> really? so a rally into year end and a pullback next year says the biggest bull on wall street? >> it's possible. >> okay. tom, thank you. still to come, the ramifications of the repeal and replace of obamacare. peter orszag is sticking around to weigh on what will change next year. and we have a look at top s&p gainers. a couple of big movers there. noble energy up 4.5%. "squawk box" will be right back. generosity is its own form of power.
you can handle being a mom for half an hour. i'm in all the way. is that understood? i don't know what she's up to, but it's not good. can't the world be my noodles and butter? get your mind out of the gutter. mornings are for coffee and contemplation. that was a really profound observation. you got a mean case of the detox blues. don't start a war you know you're going to lose. finally you can now find all of netflix in the same place as all your other entertainment. on xfinity x1.
welcome back to "squawk box." trump has promised to repeal and replace obamacare. what are the chances of it getting overturned? let's ask our guest host this morning peter orszag. a guy who helped create obamacare. >> i will proudly say i was there during the creation. >> are you depressed it will go away or will it go away? >> the net result in my opinion is five years from now more people will have insurance because the replacement will have to do something. and secondly we are on a different trajectory on costs. we are moving away for fee for service. but the pieces will be different. >> to the extent it's now going
to be rebranded trump something -- >> we're in a new world. yeah. >> what do you think it could look like? >> i think that's going to happen is we will have repeal done early next year to take effect in 2019. what people miss on that is if that's actually going to happen, you need the replace bill done by 2019. 2019 will probably become 2020. you're going to have obamacare around for awhile. but when the replace does take effect, it will have many similarities. instead of exchanges, there will be websites to pick your insurance. instead of premium subsidies. there are certain broad similarities. >> you have a lot of health care clients. what are you telling them right now? >> well, basically that -- look, there is a lot of noise in the
system as the replace piece comes in. if you're in the payer space, that's going to be particular. but in the rest of the health sector what matters is this away from fee for service toward value based payment. >> in terms of the winners and losers thus far, you look at the stock market and say that makes sense to me? >> yeah. the impact -- by the way, the other piece of course is the tax piece that we were talking about before. because many of these firms also do have significant overseas profits. >> are there clear winners in your view given the uncertainty? i mean, it's pretty clear who the potential losers could be, there's the hospital operators, ones more exposed to medicare. but are there winners at this point that you can point to? >> i think one thing that's likely to happen, for example, is medicare advantage is currently a third of the market. i think that share will rise significantly. it's long been a key part of the republican orthodoxy to promote
medicare advantage. that's one example. the tax piece is another. >> in terms of how achievable some of these rollbacks are, last week speaker ryan told andrew and joe that he'd had his whole team there ready to go with everything they want to deploy. isn't the republicans as a whole ready to act? >> getting through the house is never the difficulty. almost never. the problem is the senate. so the replace bill will likely require 60 votes. that means you have to pick up eight democratic senators. the interesting question is what do they demand? what is on their list of priorities? so as one example, i think the market has completely discounted any further pricing pressure from pharma from the federal government. i don't know what those eight or nine democratic senators will demand, but you can imagine an array of things being discounted that they say you want our vote, we need this.
>> where are -- going away from health care for a second, just where are the fault lines within the democratic party right now and within the republican party when it comes to all of the things that trump is going to want to do. and the political capital that's going to get used, by the way, on some of his appointments. whether it be steve mnuchin or tillerson, estt cetera. >> let's start on that. it is -- we are way early in this process. we haven't seen the vetting done. don't forget about this time eight years ago, tom daschle who had been the senator coming in. we had one iconic in popularity. if i were on this show eight years ago, i would have said 100% tom daschle gets confirmed. there was a problem in the vetting and it didn't happen. we haven't seen that. all of these nominees are coming in with complex backgrounds that have a lot of potential conflicts, et cetera.
i think you're going to see more of you're seeing with mr. tillerson where there are some republican senators who say i have questions here. and you don't need to lose that many. >> who's got the toughest task? >> you don't know yet. again, until you're through that vetting process, you don't know. what's interesting about the tillerson appointment is the concern is being voiced and articulated so early in the process. and it's just highlighting going back to even getting the legislation done, it's one thing to say things. legislating becomes messy really fast. even if you control both the house and the senate. >> would you say that trump could lose political capital over this in such early stages? >> you have to remember these are the same people. you go to senator "x" and say i need you for this nomination. i've done this. it is the new president. you can't fight us on this. we need you. then when you go back for health care or tax or whatever, they say look, i gave it the office. you twisted my arm.
enough. >> now that the democrats are out of power, how do you think they react over the next two years? >> big question, unknown answer. there is a split in the democratic party that was manifest during the campaign. what the democrat party needs to do, though, is speak to working class people and figure out some both policy and messaging that returns the party to its roots that was clearly -- >> who do you see in the party as an emerging leader? >> it is hard to know and what is interesting about the last few presidential cycles is we've been on a declining trend in terms of federal experience. in some sense, the more burdened you are at the federal level, the harder it is to project forward that there's going to be big change happening. so there are a lot of new people on the democratic scene, it's just hard to know right now who shakes out. >> round off on the health care question we started on. do you think by the end of the trump presidency, the net effect of both obama and trump's
presidency is a significant improvement in the health care provisions across the united states? is that something that will be part of obama's legacy? >> yes. that's what i was trying to say before. because even with the changes, the republicans can't afford to have 20 million or more people lose insurance. so the replacement however designed is going to have to minimize that loss of insurance. that means on net more people will have insurance than if we didn't go through this experime experiment. and at the same time the system is changing. there is massive change afoot that everyone who participates in health care is expeeshsing. and that will continue. >> okay. final question real quick. if you were invited to this tech meeting this afternoon. i think it's at 2:00. what would you tell the president-elect? >> stop tweeting about individual companies. >> you think that's going to -- >> i think that's a very harmful way of governing. no one will say that at the meeting, but if i were there, that's what i'd say. which is why i'm not inviting.
>> and the other is whether he tweets about the fed today. >> peter orszag, thanks for joining us. when we return, remember "wall street" was a hit back then. madonna was the top artist and the top show was "cheers" on nbc. jim paulsen echoes of 1987 and says that's returning to the markets. but this time without a crash. we're going to find out why he has taken that view in just a bit.
is it because so many go after it the same way? chasing after short term returns. instead if getting caught up with the crowd, the investment managers at pgim take a long term view, teaming specialized active investing with risk-management rigor, to seek out global opportunities. we manage over a trillion dollars this way, attracting many of the world's leading investors. partner with pgim. the global investment management businesses of prudential why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away
for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. tadirectv now. stream all your entertainment! anywhere! anytime! can we lose the 'all'. there's no cbs and we don't have a ton of sports. anywhere, any... let's lose the 'anywhere, anytime' too. you can't download on-the-go, there's no dvr, yada yada yada. stream some stuff! somewhere! sometimes! you totally nailed that buddy. simple. don't let directv now limit your entertainment. only xfinity gives you more to stream to any screen.
up one basis points to 4.2%. that's the highest since october of 2014. goldman sachs expecting to name david solomon as top. saying the move could come as soon as today. david faber previously reported news of solomon's impending promotion. two jobs apparently weren't enough for carlos ghosn. you ready for this? he's already chief executive of nissan. now he's been appointed as chairman for mitsubishi motors. nissan took a 34% controlling stake in the japanese automaker back in october. he's collecting up titles. i wonder how he -- if i remember, he used to have a flipped business card. >> oh, really? >> i've never met him personally so i've not known that. >> i don't know how you do -- >> do a third roll?
>> three commendimensional? >> a box. give him a year, maybe he'll do it. merge with another couple. now to today's economic agenda which of course is dominated by one event. the decision on fed interest rates. that will be released 2:00 p.m. eastern time. that's followed by janet yellen's news conference at 2:30 p.m. eastern time. catch all the action here on cnbc. me and the gang on "power lunch" will be there to cover that all. there are other key reports to watch today. 8:30 eastern time, producer price index and retail sales are out. 9:15 a.m. industrial production. then at 10:00, business inventories. the trump rally may be the next chapter in a decade-long recovery that's lacked the confidence of other recoveries. that being said, our next guest says he believes some of these so-called animal spirits are finally awakening and trump is part of the reason why. jim paulsen, thank you for
joining us. let's start with that. the animal spirits point. we've taken it from the fact that you say there are similarities from today to 1987 especially because of the awakening of animal spirits. >> that's right. in '85, '86, the economy slowed way down and inflation fell. pessimism sort of increased over that period about the reagan recovery failing. and so we start -- went into 1987 with quite a bit of pessimism and anxiety. then the economy picked up, inflation picked up. and animal spirits came out for the first time really in the reagan recovery and you had a rush of the public into the stock market. the dow jones went from 1900 to 2700 in the first nine months. up 40%. and the long term bond yield rose from 7% to 10% in the first nine months. huge run. then of course we had the famous
collapse that happened. >> we're looking at the chart now of '86 to '88. >> right. and i don't think we're going to see anything of the same magnitude. but i think the character is similar. coming into the last couple years dealing with very sluggish real growth with negative year on year earnings. then suddenly having economic data recently around the globe. earnings growth have been revived. suddenly you're seeing confidence in animal spirits sort of improve. i think that's through the stock market and bond yields. i think some of those trends are going to continue next year and maybe we go higher before the stock market runs out of gas against higher yields. >> jim, as you just said there, you said you don't think we have the same magnitude of collapse in terms of the stock market.
what type of magnitude is due and what might be the kind of spark for it? >> well, i think the spark is kind of started better real gdp growth. united states jumping up to 3.2% in the third quarter. maybe better in the fourth. the return of earnings has sparked it. i think the fact that the fed is finally normalizing monetary policy is actually lifting confidence. i think the side of watching yields lift off from zero around the globe is sparking confidence again. of less regulations, lower corporate tax rates. maybe continuing to stimulate growth. all of that, i think, is bringing out for the first time a little bit of widespread confidence in the future of this recovery. and that's just going through the financial markets and the more cyclical risk.
my ges is maybe we go up higher than you think next year. maybe the s&p, you know, rushes ahead at some point to 2450 or something and bond yields back up maybe towards 3.5%. and maybe they'll be at that point a very good trade opportunity to move from risk on to risk off again. >> that's higher from where we are right now, jim. i wonder what could be the catalyst to make people think, you know, after being up if you count the election day 6% from there and then another 8% from here. up all that and say you know what? it's time for me to take risk off. at a time when the fiscal stick lus might be kicking in. >> yeah. i do see that, melissa. i'm not suggesting we won't have pullbacks along the way. but my guess -- that's all it is. after seven or eight years after pessimism about the future,
there's a different sense in the country that things might be improving a little bit. and that trend might keep equities going up longer than people currently anticipate. and i kind of think that's going to maybe dominate over the first half of next year. >> i know you're a long-term thinker, not a short-term thinker. there's a lot of people on the sidelines awaiting this moment of potential pullback or not. the one thing i'd ask is to the extent you think people are holding out to sell stuff in early 2017, do you think that's going to happen? and do you think there's a likely pullback just in the first couple weeks given the tax strategy a lot of investors have right now? >> yeah, i mean, that could certainly happen, andrew. there could be some short-term pause and pullback. and certainly the inaugural address is a nice date because it feels like buying the rumor, selling the news kind of thing. but my point is even if there is a bit of a pause or a pullback,
i think it might be short lived and we might snap back and continue to go higher after that hits. and the bigger pullback might come later in the year for higher levels. and i do think there might be an excellent trading opportunity to move back to risk off, maybe even buy bonds again. but i think it's going to come from higher levels than we are at today. >> what's the market reaction if the fed surprises and does not hike rates today? >> you know, i think if they really didn't hike rates at all, it's unlikely they will do that. probably unlikely the reaction will be in their message and dot plot and forecasts for next year. but i think the fed is getting moved here. the real rate setter here, the economy, is dictating to the fed what they have to do.
they're already dictating one increase. multiple rate increases in 2017. what i find interesting is the fact the fed's going to raise rates might actually be boosting confidence that we're finally at a point of normalization again leading actually juicing animal spirits rather than the other way around. >> jim, great stuff. thanks for joining us this morning. >> thanks for having me. >> do you remember when chuck prince said when the music's playing tough get up and dance? >> this is where we are. whether we like it or not. >> just don't know when the music's going to stop. coming up, ceo of gas company hess will join us to talk why rex tillerson and oil is going to drive growth in the trump administration. and right now wti down 1.5%. "squawk box" will be right back.
tillerson as secretary of state. john hess of hess corporation now with us to discuss. >> good to be back. >> let's start with rex tillerson. you know him well and have done business with him. >> rex is an outstanding business leader. he does his homework. he's very knowledgeable about foreign affairs. you know, obviously he's someone that's extremely well qualified, i think, in foreign issues. >> what do you think about the complicated relationship we have as a nation with russia and his business relationship? >> well, you know, he runs one of the largest companies in the world. meets with world leaders all the time. that obviously makes him pretty knowledgeable in dealing with foreign leaders and understanding foreign issues. as secretary of state, one has to put the national interest first. >> is he friends with putin personally or just doing deals with him? >> he deals with putin as a government leader as he would any government leader where he has to do business. >> let's talk about rick perry.
>> sure. >> what do you make of him being the energy secretary? >> well, look, it's clear that the trump administration puts high priority on energy. that oil and gas are engines of economic growth going forward. obviously as governor of texas, governor perry knows oil and gas. >> right. where do you land on those who will meet with donald trump today, elon musk and all of the clean energy efforts so far? >> you had bill gates on yesterday. i think investment in innovation and clean energy is important wi, but we're going to need all of the above to have sustainable energy for the world. renewable energy in the next 25 years will grow faster in the energy mix than any other supply source, oil and gas according to the international energy agency is going to be 50% of the mix in 2040. so we're going to need oil and gas for economic prosperity and
we're also going to need growth. >> very diplomatic answer. but behind closed doors, ceos of oil and gas companies, are they celebrating? not only do you have rick perry, you've got rex tillerson, and somebody heading the epa that's worked to challenge epa regulations. i mean, this is like a trifecta of amazing energy for the sector, gd for our economy. they're high paying jobs. also good for investment. oil and gas investment is very important to economic growth. and it's also good for national security. so at the end of the day, i think people have to realize that oil and gas are important to our economy. i think an important thing to note two years ago conventional wisdom was when oil prices were down, it was good for the stock market. actually, if you look at this year, high oil prices actually make the stock market higher. so oil and gas are important to future economic growth and also the stock market in the country. >> lots of wealthy business leaders getting jobs in the
president-elect's administration. of course rex tillerson is a great example of that in a role as a political diplomat. one you might of thought needs someone with political experience. what do you make of the criticisms of too many business leaders in what is of course political roles? do you think they're going to be practical? will it be game changing? >> the two points there is are they skilled and knowledgeable about the area? a lot of these business leaders have to deal with foreign leaders, foreign governments to make agreements that are win/wins. and i think that skill is important in diplomacy. it's clear if you're in a position like that for our government, you want to put the national interest first. >> let's talk about opec. let's talk about the price of oil. >> sure. >> when you go into the board meetings of your own company and sort of map out the possibilities of where oil is going to be the next 12 months,
what do you think? >> you know, i was lucky last year when joe asked me what's the price going to be next year? and the price was $37 that i was pressed. but i said it was going to be $60. it pays to be lucky. but i don't have a crystal ball so i can't go there. what the important takeaway is, oil prices used to be $100. too much supply. at $50 or $40, not enough supply. so the way we look at it, it's probably a rage of $60 to $80. the recent opec agreement was historic and it's real. if you think about it, it's remarkable they got 13 opec countries and 11 non-opec countries to make a production deal. i think that's remarkable. i was with the secretary general yesterday of opec. you can tell by talking to him and what he's done in diplomacy for three months that they are committed to makes this work. you know, we simply weren't investing enough in the business. global oil and gas industry has
gone from $700 billion a year of investment to $380 billion this year. organization says you have to spend $600 billion a year to keep it level. for two years we've been under that. so you clearly have to have a new chapter of rising oil prices to attract investment, to grow supply, to keep up with growing demand. i think that's important. another point besides investment is the deficits. the deficits were hemorrhaging public companies. and it was also hemorrhaging opec. so i think, you know, we're going through cycles. we've just been through a low cycle. i think we're now in an upward trajectory of prices to make sure we increase investment to make sure we have enough oil to keep prices actually down three and five years from now. >> how are you feeling going into 2017? this has been a banner year. we've seen oil prices double if your price forecast is right for
2017. you got a seat at the table that is arguably a bigger seat, more positioned seat in the trump administration, and the sector itself the equities up 27% year to date. is 2017 going to be even be rt? >> you also have to talk about that a lot of these equities were down 40% a year earlier. we're making up lost ground. but at the end of the day, melissa, what's most important for the oil and gas supply? the price to attract investment. and it's a capital intensive biss. we have to have a price signal to make sure we have enough supply to be affordable, that it's going to keep price stability, and it's also going to have supply security. that's something i talked to the secretary general of opec yesterday about. he said we're all in the same boat. you know, what's good for opec is good for america and it's good for the world. if we have enough supply of oil going forward. the fact that we're going to have a regulatory regime that hopefully is a little more pragmatic is a net plus. but the more important thing for us in the business is to have a
high enough price to have -- >> so you're feeling good going into 2017? >> yes. >> quick demand coming on for oil globally? particularly the likes of china. are you concerned this could take a chunk out of this optimism next year? >> that was a big issue last january. where we said china was melting down and therefore stock markets were melting down and oil prices were marking down. that was a pretty tough month. what we see going forward is oil demand growing about 1 million barrels a day. about 40% of that demand growth is from china and from india. >> okay. john hess, thank you. happy holidays. >> happy holidays to you. thank you. coming up when we return, stocks you need to watch. as we head to a break, here's yesterday's top dow gainers. "squawk" returns in just a moment.
this is my retirement. retiring retired tires. and i never get tired of it. are you entirely prepared to retire? plan your never tiring retiring retired tires retirement with e*trade. i'm in vests and as a vested investor in vests i invest with e*trade, where investors can investigate and invest in vests... or not in vests. sign up at etrade.com and get up to six hundred dollars.
tadirectv now. stream all your entertainment! anywhere! anytime! can we lose the 'all'. there's no cbs and we don't have a ton of sports. anywhere, any... let's lose the 'anywhere, anytime' too. you can't download on-the-go, there's no dvr, yada yada yada. stream some stuff! somewhere! sometimes! you totally nailed that buddy. simple. don't let directv now limit your entertainment. only xfinity gives you more to stream to any screen. let's take a look at stocks to watch this morning. nvidia upgraded to buy. even after a year-run-up of 181%. the graphics chip maker should continue to benefit from the advancement of artificial intelligence related devices. hertz announced the retirement
of ceo and board members. they have named katherine marinelo as new ceo. and qualcomm was downgraded at jpmorgan. johnson & johnson is dropping its pursuit of actelion. you have a better accent. wilf vould do it. >> it's a european story. so you should. >> i'm willing to pay the price needed to seal a deal. sanofi is now in talks to buy the largest biotech firm. wells fargo has been hit with sanctions by federal regulators for failing the so-called living will tests. that provision of the dodd/frank law mandates an adequate plan should it find itself on the brink of -- the stock just sold off a little bit more in e the last hour.
now over 1% in the premarket. >> you think generally nobody thinks this is a massive issue. it's fixable. >> it's very fixable. it was a surprise they failed it, but the current punishment for it is nothing that really affects their business. for example, the man outline of it was you can't buy anything internationally at the moment. >> do we know anything on what happened? >> well, the living will is a complicated issue. of course back in may, a lot of the guys felt them. >> jpmorgan, bank of america. >> all of the ceos said we're working with them. it's not like where they sit and wait. it's something they permanently work with regulators on. they're thought to be miles away from meeting it. >> wasn't wells fargo also slapped on the risk by the community lending board where some possible infractions or violations. something to do with their practices. >> lots of wells fargo things like this recently. a couple of court cases popping up and some issue with insurance areas as well.
there's been a dearth of ne negative wells fargo news. if this issue is behind them or not. other the last few days. still ahead, more on the trump rally in today's big fed meeting. and bob corker will join us to talk about the trump transition. and scott mcneily will join us to talk trump and the titans of they can. "squawk" returns in a moment.
♪ it's been over 100 years since the first stock index was created, as a benchmark for average. yet a lot of people still build portfolios with strategies that just track the benchmarks. but investing isn't about achieving average. it's about achieving goals. and invesco believes doing that today requires the art and expertise of high-conviction investing. translation?
why invest in average? ♪ well, if you want to sing out, sing out ♪ ♪ and if you want to be free, be free ♪ ♪ 'cause there's a million things to be ♪ ♪ you know that there are ♪ and if you want to be me, be me ♪ ♪ and if you want to be you, be you ♪ ♪ 'cause there's a million things to do ♪ ♪ you know that there are ♪
will janet yellen fuel the market rally or spoil the party? >> china threatens to fight back. what officials in beijing are saying about donald trump and what it may mean for u.s. business. plus silicon valley headed to trump tower. titans of the tech industry will meet with president-elect today to talk about jobs and the economy. scott mcnealy will join us as the final hour of "squawk box" begins right now. ♪
live from the the busiest city in the world, new york city, this is "squawk box." >> i'm andrew ross sorkin and melissa lee and wilfred frost pop take a quick look at the futures. we've had a little bit, gained on the dow. >> 20,000 here we come. >> you had your breather. but we were over. >> nasdaq looks like it'll open higher about five points higher. among today's top stories, the fed will wrap up a meeting at 2:00 p.m. eastern time.
economic projections by fomc members. watch the news conference right here of course on cnbc. in political news, it is official president-elect donald trump announcing his intention to nominate rick perry as secretary of energy. goldman sachs will promote david solomon. the announcement could come today. president-elect trump will hold a summit with leaders today. john harwood has the latest. good morning. >> reporter: good morning. today the president-elect is going to come face-to-face with an industry that didn't like his campaign one bit and the feeling was mutual. tech leaders felt that his crude populism was something that wasn't with his values.
and jeff bezos said using his ownership of "the washington post" to protect the tax status of his companies. he went after apple for producing overseas. and now the tech leaders are hoping that he will moderate some of the trade rhetoric. here's bill gates yesterday sitting down with our becky quick. >> well, i don't think it'd be a good deal to have trade relations between china and the u.s. really fall apart. and so i feel sure even as they try to tune things, they won't want the lose/lose you would get if you start to get large falls. the president-elect is very sophisticated. i hope he's had adjustment there without that typical sort of tit
for tat. >> of course there's recent back and forth between the president-elect and china over the one china policy. what the implications that might have for u.s./china relations. and we're going to have to see what sort of accommodation we get from people like elon musk, sheryl sandberg, tim cook all showing up for this meeting today. >> how is this being framed? is this something -- an example of progress from donald trump? coming back from some of his campaign rhetoric and being accepting of tech leaders? or is it an afterthought these guys once most of the cabinet have taken shape are getting a brief consultation. but not the kind of access that leaders of finance have got. >> reporter: well, certainly the orientation of donald trump during his campaign was to older
parts of american industry. right? he talked about bringing back coal jobs. he talked about bringing back steel jobs. he emphasized the rust belt. clearly he did not campaign in california where hillary clinton beat him overwhelmingly. so we're just going to have to see whether or not he is able to or wants to monetize some of those positions to please them. it's incumbent upon you to relate to the entire country. so in some ways the meeting is not a surprise. the only question's going to be whether there are policy commitments that come out of it or whether this is simply an icebreaker and we go back to the corners that the two sides were in before the election. >> john, great stuff. thank you very much. we look forward to in particular the faces of the tech leaders as they depart the building a the meeting. ahead of that tech summit, ibm's
rometty has an op-ed today. she says new jobs will come over the span of four years including a 6,000 added positions in 2017. the company will invest $1 billion in retraining and developing its u.s. workers over the same time span focusing specifically on vocational education. rometty will urge trump to support these retraining efforts so workers are better qualified and can fill a growing skills gap. in other political and market news this morning, a new report in the china daily newspaper says china's government will soon slap a penalty on an unnamed u.s. automaker for monopolistic behavior. said the u.s. company had instructed distributors to fix prices starting back in -- ford mjm kicking lower since the story broke overnight. you're looking at gm down about 4% and ford down about 2%. another record-breaking session for the dow but still no 20,000 plp today be the day?
joining us now dan suzuki from bank of america merrill lynch and hans olsman. dan, you say -- it's a big prediction. another 20% if the hope becomes reality. that's a lot of stars aligning, isn't it? >> yeah, it is. that's why it's not the base case. but it's a rally that's driven by hope. now, if policy makers can deliver and turn that hope into reality, i think there's as much as 20% upside from here. now, the good thing for the markets today is that they have two things really going for it. growth and sentiment. from the growth side, the starting base for the starting point for growth is already really low. we essentially have half of e emerging markets in a recession and we're just coming out of this mini industrial and energy recession in the u.s. so i think even without the trump initiatives, you're going to get a pickup in growth. you've already started to see it show up. if you layer on top of that,
deregulation, tax cuts, and infrastructure spending, it's a recipe for a big pickup in growth. >> that implies not all of that has been priced into the markets. for instance, the corporate tax cut. is 1% boost to eps on the s&p 500 for instance. saying that there's another 20% even though we've already rallied about 6% implies we haven't seen it priced in. >> so this is sort of the second positive thing for the markets. the leg up from here is not going to be one driven by the fundamental analysis and what the fair market of the market is. we're already pricing it in. but there's a huge long runway for sentiment to improve here. if you look at the one thing that's been missing from this bull market, glaringly missing, it's been euphoria. we're just now exiting the skepticism phase. we've had this massive shift in sentiment over the last month. biggest flows into equities, you had the biggest pickup in sentiment in this expansion, et
cetera. so i think there's a lot of room to run for the markets to get to euphoria. >> and we've seen a big outflow from bonds. are you riding the trump rally train? are you in the first car? where are you on this? >> i'm certainly on the train. we're enjoying the run, for sure. we exceeded what we expected to get this year. i personally am rooting for you, dan. i want that 20%. but i think the reality is going to be somewhat different than the perception. right? so i think we've pulled forward a lot of the expectations as to what the new administration will bring. we'll get back to sort of more pedestrian earnings. the expectations this year going into 2017 are from the bottom up basis. that's about a 32 bucks increase. you give that the normal hair cut and yeah you're talking about a forward multiple going from 17 to 18. and if you have any -- you need
margin of error there. you have any disappointment there, you know, you are -- you hit head winds quickly. the devil's going to be in the details and there are a lot of details at this point. the thing to come back to is observing the things we can know. and the things we know is the middle market of the u.s. where most of the commercial activity happens continues to go along pretty nicely. right? the data, small business optimism really good. hiring plans are good. revenue trends, earning trends remain very good there. so i think the backdrop which before the election was good, it's continuing and you get a little bit of a bump through lighter regulation. and hopefully we see a 10% return or so in -- >> that is domestic focused, that discussion. what about the international environment? of course start of 2016 is what derailed markets. are we a bit blinded to risks
because of this euphoria at the moment? >> the thing from our perspective that kept us away from the like is the notion that as u.s. economic activity moves into a higher gear or sustains itself and normalizization occurs, the first place that's going to feel the impact of that would be the last place that money ran to. for the most part that was in some degree on developed markets. we expect that to come back. and those markets to hit head winds. >> you're positive on the uk. >> i am. >> i am. i thought if it brexited it wouldn't be the end of the world. and you got a selloff in the currency, it would be good for the export side and earnings. that's exactly what's happening. >> which sectors do you like the
most quickly? >> we like health care, financials, telecom, and discretionary. >> okay. thank you, guys. >> thanks. >> happy holidays. some stocks to watch this morning, the mining equipment maker's revenues fell short as the commodity price slump continues to impact joy global's customers' shares. very strong year they've had already. express scripts is reaffirming its forecast. related to its position of its medical unit. the pharmacy benefits manager is also revising its methodology for reporting network claims. up about 0.5%. coming up, senator bob corker will lead confirmation hearings for rex tillerson next month. but first he'll join us next. plus what's next for russia's u.s. relations. holman jenkins will be here to talk about his latest column.
and later, silicon valley is heading to trump tower. "squawk box" will be right back. they say the world does not revolve around you. but today, maybe it can. i am helping 1-800-flowers find the perfect gift out of trillions of combinations. and working with the new york genome center to find treatments as personal as dna. and i am helping sesame street make education unique to every child. hello, my name is watson. working together, we can outthink anything. hello, my name is watson. they are the natural borns enemy of the way things are. yes, ideas are scary, and messy and fragile. but under the proper care,
did yon your prescriptions? to save up to 95% introducing blink health. blink has negotiated some of the lowest prices so you can get your same medication, at your same pharmacy, for a lower price. just go to blinkhealth.com, pay for your prescription, and pick up at your regular pharmacy. blink is accepted at nearly every pharmacy nationwide. go to blinkhealth.com and get $10 off your first purchase, promo code: tv.
welcome back to "squawk box." let's have a look at the futures which are broadly flat at this hour. the dow fractionally in negative territory suggesting that 20k may prove elusive for just one more day. we finished yesterday 90 points away or about 0.5% away. yesterday although the dow was up, it was the underperformer. the 10-year note just slipping back in terms of from the 2.5% handle. all eyes on the yield curve as when we get the rate decision. and the dollar broadly treading water today. not much move. it's softer, though, by about 0.2%. back to politics, but invariably becoming a business story these days. the trump cabinet takes shape. our next guest will lead the confirmation hearing for rex
tillerson. senator bob corker, chairman of the senate foreign relss committee. we welcome him to the program. good morning. >> good to be with you. thank you, sir. >> so let's talk about this confirmation battle. the front page of "the wall street journal" here says confirmation battle looms for tillerson. how much of a battle do you imagine it is going to be given some of the comments not just by democrats but people like marco rubio who says he has serious concerns about this appointment? >> well, it is going to be a little different than the ones we've had in the past. the last two secretaries of state were almost pro forma because people understood where they were on issues. look, coming to this secretary of state position is a very, you know, impressive individual that has done business all over the world, has run a 70,000 person organization. the state department has 75,000 people. knows many of these leaders up close and personal. so, you know, somebody's going to be coming to the table that
certainly understands the world. the questions people are going to have, though, are what are his views. they understand he's going to be carrying out trump's foreign policy, not his own if he's going to be successful. but they also know up under the hood, he's going to be giving guidance to the president. people are going to want to understand what that is. my guess is that he's a savvy guy. he'll handle these issues well. my understanding is he's thinking of making home visits right now. you know, we're out of session. he may visit people in their towns. we'll see what happens. my guess is he'll be well prepared. >> do you have concerns about his relationship with putin to the extent he has one? >> well, look. i don't hold it against someone that they have relationships. i do think you've got a situation here where you have a president coming in who is focused on, quote, prolific deal making. and the norms that have created
the alliances that we've had, for instance, in europe over the last 60 or 70 years. they're being set to a degree. i think people rightly so want to understand how he's going to coach the president as it relates to issues relative to russia. look, this -- you know, what's happening right now in syria and other places, asad as you know has been brutal. russia's been involved in that. what they've done in eastern ukraine, how they're threatening the baltics. that matters to all of us. and he's got to be in a position to share with us how he will be -- what his view on those kind of things are. there's no doubt he's a qualified person. people are going to want to know what are his views on these issues. and others in the middle east and around the world. >> earlier on this people peter orszag suggested that so tough
some of these approvals will be that it will, in fact, use up a lot of the president-elect's political capital. such that some of these hopes that are priced in by markets for various policies whether they be on tax cuts, deregulation, or things like obamacare, that he won't get some of those bills passed because getting confirmation through will use up so much of his political capital. what do you make of that? >> well, i don't think it's going to use his capital getting con for magss. at the end of the day it's going ton up to the individuals. my guess is -- i mean, there are a lot of questions. for instance, recollectix tille think he's going to rise to the occasi occasion. you have hadley and cheney and those, i don't think you see people like them who know him well lining up behind someone who's going to have a nontraditional view of russia or the middle east or other places. my guess is, we'll see. it's up to him.
but he'll rise to the occasion. he won't be burning any of trump's capital. nor will the other nominees. it's really up to them. but you're right. i mean, there's a schedule. we all have focused on this, it's a lot that has to happen. just in i think in the state department on the front end. i think there are 36 to 38 confirmations that people may not be aware of forgetting all the ambassadors. but there's a time frame and it takes time to move things across the senate floor. money of us want to focus on tax reform. those kind of things that you guys were talking about earlier that are going to stimulate the economy into the future for decades. and so, yes, i mean, the calendar becomes an issue. but not i don't think political capital. >> senator, front page of "the new york times" this morning as exxon head tillerson put company needs over u.s. interests. the story talks about how back in 2011 rex tillerson sidestepped baghdad and washington signing a deal with the kurdish administration in the country's north and that the move undermined iraq's central
government strengthened kurdish ambitions and contravened the goals of the united states. how should you think about that in the context of his new role? >> so, look. i had conversations with mr. tillerson when we were putting sanctions on russia. as i did, by the way, with many ceos who had concerns. and i understand how people are going to weigh in on those kinds of things. on the kurdistan issue, again, he was representing the shareholders of exxon. i don't think was moving beyond a breaking law or anything like that. but, look. he will be shedding all of his exxon interests. no way he's going to serve as secretary of state and hold those. it will now be his national interest. but look. the questions you raise are going to be exactly the kinds of questions people are going raise
in these hearings. we all are going to have a chance to hear how he answers those. we constantly bump into questions on a weekly and monthly basis where u.s. policies because of concerns we have about russia or eastern ukraine or any other places bump up against what might be in a shareholder interest in a country. they had long-term investments, the kurds have done a great job of making themselves separate and unique in many ways. the kurds are strongly supported by many americans. they were just in my office a week before last. and those are things that will be flushed out during these hearings. >> while we have you, i want to get your views on fannie and freddie. steve mnuchin, the potentially incoming treasury secretary, made some comments about privatizing those institutions. you've been pressing for that for quite some time. i remember back in 2015 at one point you suggested that
investors short those companies. the stock has since moved. what do you think is really going to happen at this point? >> well, i said that because we knew that people were putting rumors out about the fact they were going to be ipo'd. i was bringing attention to it. we've got a duopoly here. one that's backed by taxpayers. and i just think the model of having private gains and public losses is something that needs to end. we have two entities that even before this collapsed were arrogant. and so, you know, we need to create an innovative, competitive environment for housing finance reform. it's very complicated. and no doubt they have some critical mass that at present has been important. but i really don't know what mnuchin's views on these are. as you know, i was able to pass
a piece of legislation which keeps this in congress' hands for at least 12 more months. meaning that nothing can happen without congressional approval. but look, we're beginning to have some discussions with some of these people that own shares and understand what it is they think is an appropriate model and i hope we'll be able to deal with this. my goal -- i have no animus toward shareholders or the entities. just a housing finance system that is innovative and that we have a situation that is worthy and treats our taxpayers fairly. the way fannie and freddie have been set up in the past is not that. >> let me ask you one final question. we've been asking a lot of people this question in washington which is, to the extent that there's a view that the republican party is one contiguous group at this point and also in power obviously both in congress, the senate, and in
the white house, where do you see the fault lines as some of the policies that we keep talking about get developed? >> yeah, i think one of the -- look. at the end of the day, the republican party doesn't need to lose its head here. okay? i mean, yeah, this is exciting time, but got almost $20 trillion in debt. i think that is going to end up being a fault line. i mean, you know, i'm glad everybody's making money. the dow is almost at 20,000. it's unbelievable. and, you know, people want to talk about massive infrastructure investment. but look, these things need to be, quote, paid for. we don't need to lose our head over a victory. and my guess is that's where much of the fault line business is going to take place. and that is making sure that what we do keeps us fiscally
sound. so, you know, if some of these reforms, if the growth can show a growth in revenues also, meaning the tax reform, then i think people likely will support it. but if we're just out here partying because we won and we want to make business great and not take into account some of these fiscal issues, i think that's where you're going to begin to see some rubs. >> all right. senator bob corker, we always appreciate your time. appreciate seeing you. which you a happy holidays. thank you very much. >> thank you so much. just going update on some of the goldman sachs news. it's official in the transition of leadership. david solomon and harvey schwartz both getting the top nod. but they are now both presidents and both co-coos. martin chavez as expected is becoming chief financial officer but not until april 2017. and a few more details on that which we can bring you later. and in other breaking political news, president-elect donald trump's strategic and
policy forum has three new members including more tech ceos. uber ceo travis kalanick, elon musk, and indra nooyi will be joining the group. coming up, two economic reports. we're minutes away from retail sales and ppi. we'll bring you the numbers next. this is my headquarters. this is where i trade and manage my portfolio. since i added futures, i have access to the oil markets and gold markets. okay. i'm plugged into equities- trade confirmed- and i have global access 24/7. meaning i can do what i need to do, en i can focus on what i want to do. visit learnfuturestoday.com to see what adding futures can do for you.
for decades, investors have used a 60/40 stock and bond model, with little in alternatives. yet alternatives can tap opportunities that traditional assets can't. and even though they're called alternatives, they're actually designed to help meet very traditional goals. that's why invesco believes people should look past conventional models and make alternatives a core part of their portfolios. translation? goodbye 60/40, hello 50/30/20. ♪ enjoy your phone! you too.
all right, be cool. you got the amazing new iphone 7 on the house by switching to at&t... what??.... aand you got unlimited data because you have directv?? (laughs to self in disbelief) okay, just a few more steps... door! it's cool! get the iphone 7 on us and unlimited data when you switch to at&t and have directv.
we're just seconds away from retail sales and ppi. take a quick look at the futures before we get you those numbers. have you looking at dow off about 14 points, nasdaq up about 2 points. let's get to rick santelli with the numbers in chicago. >> we have a litany of data points. here we go. retail sales, advance month over month up 0.1%. that's a bit shy. up 0.2% when you strip out autos. z can the control up 0.1%. these are all very light numbers. especially when considering the control came off of an up 0.8%. let's look at ppi, shall we? everybody talking about break evens moving higher with regard to inflation. we have up 0.4%. hot, hot on headline. if we strip out food and energy, still up 0.4%. another hot number.
by the way, no revisions. and if we look at year over year numbers, up 1.3% on year over year demand. let's look at ex-food and energy. up 1.6%. this takes out 1.2% and it's hotter by 0.3% by expectations. and if we look at ex-food and energy, it's up 1.8%. also hotter. let's summarize, shall we? retail sales light, but positive numbers on the inflation front. at least on the pipelines farthest and on the producer side definitely hot. what's going on? rates seem to be paying more attention to retail sales being weak. giving up a basis point. dollar index a little light. but what is everybody looking at today? countdown to 20,000. more data points to come. back to you. >> all right. countdown to the fed. let's get to steve leisman ahead of the fed news conference.
steve, what do you make of those numbers? >> i think they're pretty interesting. i'm interested in how it's more off of the retail number weakness. and i don't know how much rick got a chance to get into this, but there was a substantial downward revision to october. i'm looking here 0.6% is the new number instead of 0.8%. looking at the numbers, still generally positive for november. with a couple big declines up. minus 0.5% is the vehicle number. that's probably a big reason for the miss by economists. we had 17.9 million units. that's always unclear how that translates to what's reported for the number of units sold into the retail sales report. other things are sort of generally positive but on the weak side. gasoline station sales up. i think looking for more rise in that. so that was was going to be part
of it. you have a downward revision. here you'll see a downward revision to overall gdp which was running 2.1%. let's get -- take a look at what's going to happen today which is the federal reserve likely to hike. everybody says why are they going to hike. the first run is in general improved economic data. despite this data this morning. now you've moved to a 3% gdp number in the third quarter. you're probably looking around 2% right now. you have this election past us. we're also not hearing as much concern about global economic weakness. you've got doves on the committee like rosengren. and then you saw this morning inflation is firming as well as wages. take a look at the next chart. you can see what's happening. inflation of the cpi moving up towards a 2% year over year number. and then you've got the atlanta fed wage tracker which is much
followed by the federal reserve and what you see there is that it's up going towards 4% right there. that was sort of this very slow gradual rise of wages that seem to begin around 2015 and that has gone along with higher consumer prices. still just 2%. but up towards the fed's goal here. what are we looking for today from the federal reserve? it's clear. everybody wants to know does janet yellen and company jump on the economic policy train? in other words, when we see the forecasts, does it boost the rate of growth. inflation and the outlook. and the key i think is do we get two or three rate hikes forecast for 2017. right now our fed survey shows 2.5% is what's looked for. and how does yellen respond? going to get questions about trump and his policies. my best guess is she says when these policies are proposed and when we can count them and figure it out and model them, then we'll make changes to the
welcome back to "squawk box." president-elect trump selecting exxonmobil exec rex tillerson for secretary of state. for more let's bring in "wall street journal" editorial board member holman jenkins. good morning. >> good morning. >> title of his column is "trump's russian reset." holman, thanks for joining us. great article. want to jump to the end of it, a point you make. it's assumed tillerson is a typical trump appointee because he's a businessman. you point out he's not a similar businessman to trump. >> he's nothing like trump as a businessman. he's a dutiful corporate climber who works for a board who is very determined to honor protocol and the proper way of doing things. he's not a wild man. but he's also a very smart and disciplined operator. as everybody, he has lots of relationships around the world. which is handy if you're secretary of state.
>> in the main part of the article, you point out what does this mean for america's relationship with russia in particular. as ceo, tillerson opposed sanctions on russia. is that purely because he was dutiful to his shareholders? is that view going to change or will he stick to that tune? >> i think he opposes sanctions, generally is not useful. of course he's working for his shareholders. had a big deal in russia that was put on the skids by those sanctions. but i think, you know, his name was not picked out of a hat by donald trump. i think he was hired for this job because of his relationship with putin. because he's a person that can talk to putin aeen who putin will listen to. since putin is potentially the worst diplomatic international disaster out there if he goes off the rails, i think it's an important priority. >> we haven't really focused on his relationship with putin. as an oil man, he has strong relationships across the middle east which is the top of the agenda item for the new administration. >> i think russia's going to be the top of the agenda item.
that's what trump has talked about, all campaign long. let's be his friend and work with him on things. i don't know how sophisticated his view is of putin's own agenda and problems. but he does not want the obama relationship with putin. >> you think we are spending too much time on russia relative to china? because clearly the conversation has moved to russia over china. and when you think about the economic issues that we've talked about on this show for so long. >> it's a case of priorities. the baltics are out there looking vulnerable. i think you do want to put that risk back in the box before you worry about other things. >> does hacking become an issue that tillerson will have to deal with? >> yeah. we're all going to have to deal with that. i think maybe it will subside, the idea this is how a unique episode, because this has been going on all the time. everybody has been ripping open the u.s. government and businesses and stealing secrets. there isn't a change for this changing the election, but the
possibility is upsetting. all the big powers aring from to come to terms on this. >> what's your reaction to president-elect trump's reaction to the news from intelligence sources around the potential hacking about russia? >> it doesn't really matter what he thinks about their hackings findings. he cannot let them control the first days of his administration. he's already getting pushback from republicans in the senate. he is not going to let the cia buffalo him into hostility with putin until he finds out that's the only relationship puth listen allow. >> he's a political ploy by the intelligence services like the cia -- that's what you think is happening here? >> i don't know. >> you think it's disingenuous? >> well, i think they're pretty sure that russia hacked. i don't think we ever know what the motives are. all through the cold war the thing the cia said was we could never figure out why they were
doing what they were doing even when we knew what they were doing. we never understood the why. i think that's true now. >> great to see you. >> thank you. president-elect trump hosting that tech round table today. who is heading to trump tower and who isn't. plus we've got scott mcnealy joining us next. "squawk" runs in just a moment. [engine revving] ♪ ♪
alaska airlines and virgin america closing their merger. now to the next to compete with the majors. phil lebeau joins us with that story. >> you are now looking at the fifth largest airline in the united states. a lot of people are wondering whether or not alaska which has succeeded with this merger can continue to grow while maintaining what's been a very strong presence as a niche airline with great customer service. keep in mind as part of this merger it had to trim its cochair flights with american just a little bit, not a lot. here's ceo brad tilldon speaking about what this means on the west coast. >> this really giving us the coast. so together when you combine the strength of alaska with virgin, we will have great strength up and down the west coast. in fact, we'll have the largest market share of any airline serving the west coast. >> and they're hoping to use that as a basis for continuing
to grow the airline nationwide. take a look at the five largest airlines in the united states. number one being american. then you have delta, united, southwest, and now alaska now that it's merged with virgin america. as i mentioned earlier, the real question for a lot of the faithful alaska fliers, will this airline continue to be able to maintain its status as a niche airline with great customer service even as it grows larger? >> we're going to be working on doing the things we've done well historically. run a great operation, provide great service, build fantastic loyalty programs. but we are going to be working on our profile, our brand to create a little bit more flare, a little more edge to the brand. and create interest to bring lots of new customers to the company. >> one thing that's most interesting, take a look at alaska air since 2009. if you look at all of the airline stocks, guys, going back to 2009, the best performance,
alaska air with the return of more than 1100%. quite a run, take a look at that chart there. back to you. >> thank you for that, phil. meantime, silicon valley now heading to trump tower today. tech executives ranging from jeff bezos to elon musk expected to meet with the president-elect today. among the topics reportedly on the agenda, jobs and how the economy will be impacted by digital keknologies. ahead of the meeting, tech stocks getting in on the rally. jumping more than 1%. and joining us right now to talk about this meeting that's been organized by peter thiel, scott mcnealy. good morning to you. >> good to be with you. >> how are you? >> good. >> so here's the question i have for you. kara swishier has called this the apprentice nerd edition. and she says in an op-ed tech executives should be ashamed of themselves for lining up like
she sheeple after all the numb skull attacks trump has made on what is the country's future forward business sector. should they be taking the meeting? >> absolutely. and i know they're all going to be bringing their own set of -- they've all got government relations folks and have issues. they're going to bring a big potpourri of issues there. but i don't think those are the -- some are going to be crony statism request. some are going to be regulatory and other things they want to impose or things they want to eliminate. that sort of thing. but it's -- they've got to go do it. they've got to get the conversation going. and i think you've got to, you know, be part of the deal making. >> do you imagine this is going to be a contentious meeting? there were reports once media executives came to visit with the president-elect, he scolded them for a good portion of the meeting. >> well, you know, i doubt it. i think he understands that this is innovation. if i were there, i can tell you what i would do.
i would be asking for a new department. we don't need more secretaries, but i would have a secretary of deconstruction of downsizing, of scope eliminating for the government. i would put a mitt romney who took the olympics and made it profitable, i would -- he's bought tons of companies and trimmed the fat and gotten focused and turned them around. we need a turnaround in the federal government. there's massive regulations, the need to be -- there's all kinds of executive orders that need to be looked at and streamlining. we've got a huge deficit. i'd have mitt romney bring in folks that are like me or jack welch or other gurus in there and absolutely drain the swamp. and there's going to be a lot of squawking with the swamp monsters, but we got to do that stuff. >> a big job ahead for the trump administration. in terms of the tech ceos about to walk into trump tower later today, scott, i mean, if you were in their shoes what would
you be most worried about? given his stance on preserving jobs here in the united states and, you know, the push towards automation and the possibility that automation will replace a lot of jobs here, would you be worried about that? i mean, ai business, for instance or the automation business? >> you know, that's been an issue forever. i would imagine the people going horseshoes in the old days were nervous about the automobile industrial. that has been happening. we have to have a more mobile work force. we have to have a better education environment and maybe not have the government do all the educating, because they're kind of slow and they're kind of a monopoly and they're kind of not real effective at it. i mean, it drives me absolutely nuts that we're scoring way worse than -- there are -- vietnam is blowing us away on all the scores. i tweeted this morning about how they're just kicking our butts.
there are -- this economy is scale to so many things that drive productivity. we're trying to solve it all from government. if i was in the meeting i would say, butt out. do the things you should be doing. defense, justice, state, those -- keeping us safe and protecting our rights and liberties, not getting into the private sector. don't get into the loan business, the financial business, managing our life. let us in the private sector do what we do and keep the monopoly government out of areas where the private sector can do it more effectively. >> if you were in the meeting, would you be pleading with the president-elect to stop tweeting directly about individual companies? >> you know, i think he needs to get the story out. he creates an enormous amount of conversation. he has been tweeting about the virtual $450 hammer. he has been tweeting about the fact that maybe we don't have the best trade deals out there. those are all very -- he is
putting an outstanding -- what i think is a very outstanding cabinet together. and he is creating the chaos, the noise and then he is going to let this team go in and rationally work -- you have to -- he is a developer. he takes the wrecking ball first to the issue and breaks the glass a little bit and then has a very, very strong that he is building. i'm pretty excited about the opportunity. >> scott, you are making a good case in the case for the government to effectively get out of the business world. but when you look at the free market, if you will, as it is, to the extent that we are in this situation -- economic situation in terms of jobs to the extent donald trump was elected in large part it's because the market hasn't necessarily worked for the middle class workers that donald trump has talked so much about and in part potentially could you argue the tech industry has been so successful both on the productivity side and frankly in
moving some of the jobs abroad in terms of manufacturing component of technology that it made it very difficult. what do you think the tech community should be doing about that on its own? >> it depends on what you think the causes are. minimum wage drives jobs out. over regulation drives jobs out. the housing sector got just totally messed up by all of the intervention and meddling that you see. i think our education environment needs choice and competition and private sector investment. if you look at what's causing these adhesions in the market and lack of fluidity, it's because of government intervention. we are here for the government to help. that's the scariest thing. i think those are the causes of our economic problems. >> always great to see you, scott. >> thank you. >> thank you for waking up early for us.
you can catch complete coverage of the tech summit on cnbc throughout the day. squawk box will be back in a couple minutes. my business was built with passion... but i keep it growing by making every dollar count. that's why i have the spark cash card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on all of my purchasing. and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... which adds fuel to my bottom line. what's in your wallet?
they are the natural borns enemy of the way things are. yes, ideas are scary, and messy and fragile. but under the proper care, they become something beautiful. why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away
final check in on the markets. can the dow hit 20 k today? it's pointing down by 14 points at the open. it's 91 points away at the close yesterday. futures anything to go by, we're not going to hit 20k today. future s pointing lower. >> we will see you later. join us tomorrow. squawk on the street begins right now. ♪ good wednesday morning. welcome to squawk on the street. it all comes down to this. the final fed meeting of the year. statements at 2:00 eastern time. pre-market is cautious as we watch for president-elect trump's meeting with tech ceos. we begin with the march toward dow 20k.